As of June 12, 2026· 2 promotions, 3 declines, 1 new this cycle

A decision instrument for the agentic developer tools landscape.

Six-dimension, evidence-graded scoring of agentic developer tools. We publish a written movement trigger for every score, so readers know what would move a tool up or down before it happens. Refreshed weekly, with caps and rationale public, and willing to flag negative signals that vendor-curated landscapes will not.

79Tools tracked
4Validated
21Assessed
44Tracked
18Briefings published

This isn't a tech radar.

Most landscapes show you what exists. We show you what is shifting and what would shift it next. Three primitives keep the radar from drifting into commodity territory.

Forward-looking movement triggers

Every score ships with a written-down answer: what would move this tool up, and what would move it down. Not 'watch for changes' — specific, falsifiable thresholds.

Caps as policy primitives

Eighteen named, numbered caps mechanically bound dimension scores. When governance is capped at 12, the cap ID is listed and the rule is public. Auditable, not hand-wavy.

Evidence is graded

Every tool carries an Evidence Grade (A/B/C) reflecting hands-on vs. research depth. Vendor-only benchmarks get labeled. The grade tells you how much weight to put on the call.

Latest briefing

2026-W23: June 1–June 7, 2026

Browse archive (18)

The week the partner/competitor line stopped being a metaphor. Microsoft shipped seven first-party MAI frontier models (Project Polaris becomes Copilot's August default) while Anthropic filed for a ~$1T IPO — our platform partner now competes with our anchor vendor while still...

Microsoft is now a model vendor competing with our anchor...The agentThe methodology race hit "now or late" — and the governance...
Read full briefing

Follow the radar

Weekly briefings and signal-level changes. Subscribe via RSS or check back Mondays.

Refreshed weekly off versioned snapshotsBuild 2026-06-1279 tools across 4 categories